Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cards for Hospitalized Kids

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 14:10, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cards for Hospitalized Kids

Cards for Hospitalized Kids (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Trailed from the AFD of Brighten A Day, this organization appears to be suffering from lack of sustained coverage. Most of its coverage spread over 2011-12 and to some extent in 2013. There are some sporadic coverage since then but nothing significant towards not considering as WP:NOTNEWS. ☆★Mamushir (✉✉) 20:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ☆★Mamushir (✉✉) 20:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:47, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Even on their website, I can find nothing later than 2016. Of course, if they wee once notable they remaim notable enough for an article. but this is the sort of subject where it is very difficult to tell `trivial and tabloid and promotional coverage from actual substantial encyclopedic coverage. It's also the sort of name thta could be used generically, forany of the many such drives (do we have a general article on the type of charity? That would make sense. DGG ( talk ) 04:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:56, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For analysis of sources provided above.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:28, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


keep- they are a legit organization that has many volunteers and commercial office space. They are in numerous journal publications. Meets WP:GNG --Rrmmll22 (talk) 03:13, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.