Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canon EOS M100
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Power~enwiki (talk) 02:45, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
- Canon EOS M100 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a product catalog. Sourced only to a corporate press release, dated today. Possibly a G11 candidate. Power~enwiki (talk) 20:43, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:01, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Product has significant news coverage outside of wikipedia, warranting its inclusion. Article needs minor improvement and tagging, not deletion. PureRED | talk to me | 13:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: This article needs to be expanded, but really is no different than other Wikipedia articles on Canon's camera technology, and may be of historic value when this camera has come and gone. Ryger3351 | talk to me | 09:05, 31 August 2017 (PST)
- Keep: I think it is a useful article for interested people, what kind of features a camera have. I think it should be seen in context with other vendor cameras, like Sony or Fuji and others. You can find also article about their cameras, some very short (Fujifilm X-A1), some more much advanced. I agree, there is place for improvement, but currently I have no better sources. --GodeNehler (talk) 17:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: To my knowledge, it is widely accepted on the WP to include articles on individual camera models, the EOS M100 is by far not the first one. Having this articles makes sense and does not make the WP a "product catalog". (In addition, to delete this article would be a precedent, also the other articles would have to be deleted.) ʘχ (talk) 16:44, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.