Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CandyFlip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. New WP:RS sources added. The article passes WP:NFILM (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp 💬 18:59, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CandyFlip (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't find any reviews for this film. one source. - ^[1] TamilMirchi (talk) 01:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 01:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 01:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• There was a previous AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CandyFlip (film). Do you think that the sources listed there are sufficient for notability? GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GeoffreyT2000: There is not enough sources in the article. TamilMirchi (talk) 02:50, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

personally i have watched the movie in Netflix .. also have a look into few more link ^[1][2] Playlikeastar (Playlikeastar) 10:58, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.

• KEEP, @TamilMirchi: not having "enough sources in the article" does not mean sources don't exist. If sources exist (and they do, just look at the 2016 notability discussion Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/CandyFlip_(film) and you will find plenty. If you feel the article needs them listed, then please go ahead and add them. Deletion is not the answer. Donaldd23 (talk) 22:13, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Sufficient sourcing exists for this to pass WP:NFILM [1][2][3][4] gobonobo ^{+ c} 19:52, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.