Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campus carbon neutrality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Carbon neutrality.  JGHowes  ^talk 01:33, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Campus carbon neutrality (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page, created in 2009, needs WP:TNT. It's a mixture of promotional junk from various climate organizations touting how much they're doing for the planet and undue promotional junk from individual colleges touting the same. It's unclear why the situation of colleges is so unique as to require separate coverage from Carbon neutrality, which has 22,000 monthly views compared to the 172 at this page. It's also so poorly integrated that it's not even linked from the main carbon neutrality page. Maybe someday we'll have a page on sustainability efforts at colleges and universities, but this is definitely not it. The best path forward right now is to redirect the title to its parent page. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 09:50, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Carbon neutrality as nom. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 09:50, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 09:50, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 09:50, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• TNT/Delete per nom. Unfortunately another low-quality student essay full of synthesis that doesn't meet the standards of an encyclopedic article. There's a lot of complete irrelevance and promotional specific examples but very little tying these together. It's a plausible topic but with very little of the content here. Reywas92^Talk 17:57, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Carbon neutrality, as per nom. Powerful Karma (talk) 14:53, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Carbon neutrality. Suonii180 (talk) 23:38, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.