Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camilla Henemark

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:28, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Camilla Henemark

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ENTERTAINER because, while she has one single that peaked at 31 on the Swedish charts, none of her albums or other singles seems to have charted at all. She has a few acting credits, but these seem to be mostly just guest appearances and nothing notable. There is no evidence she is considered important or influential in any field. Also, only four sources are cited and two of them aren't about her and only mention her.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Baronet13 (talk • contribs)

Keep. Passes WP:SIGCOV. There is coverage of her for more than her work as a solo musician. It's a bit misleading to say she has only 1 charting single. She had only one charting single as a solo artist, but had many charting songs and two charting albums as the lead vocalist for Army of Lovers from 1987 through 1992. Additionally, her affair with the King of Sweeden has been the subject of multiple publications, including a book and television and film dramatizations of the affair and scholarly works such as André Haller, Hendrik Michael, Lucas Seeber (ed.). Scandology 3: Scandals in New Media. Springer International Publishing. ISBN 9783030850135See chapters 3.5 Audience Participation and Scandalized Women and 3.6 Gender Roles and Royal Sex Scandals{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link) CS1 maint: postscript (link). There's lots of sources available in google books and google scholar in both English and Sweedish. Clearly WP:BEFORE was not followed.4meter4 (talk) 00:21, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Women, Fashion, and Sweden. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:35, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:SIGCOV. Per WP:GNG. Has had a charting song as well. BabbaQ (talk) 10:39, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Easily passes WP:SIGCOV in Swedish sources. Sjö (talk) 12:35, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As pointed out above, she easily passes WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. The focus on her career as a solo artist is a red herring, as her main importance as a musician has been as part of Army of Lovers, and additionally she has spent an unfortunate amount of time in the public eye due to her affair with the king of Sweden. /Julle (talk) 06:49, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alleged affair. WP:BLP applies. Sjö (talk) 08:11, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sorry. She has confirmed it repeatedly herself, and there's better sourcing for this than what's currently in the article, but maybe the other part in the alledged relationship hasn't, merely not denied it. Mea culpa. /Julle (talk) 12:43, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep notable as demonstrated above. The article could use some work, but deletion is not cleanup. Draken Bowser (talk) 07:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV and is definitely notable. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 00:28, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.