Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Esposito
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.--Fuhghettaboutit 00:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Cameron Esposito (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Fails WP:N. All tags regarding notability to this article have been sumarily removed without substantial article improvement. Ronbo76 21:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No reliable sources for anything. Except for the fact that they were "an assistant" in some arbitrary school. Something higher quality than that is really needed. i kan reed 21:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree with the above statements.--Kranar drogin 22:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Notability First and foremost, the focus of the article isn't even on her participation in said "arbitrary" school, but rather it chronicles her successes and notable establishments in the field of comedy--namely the similar track she is on, ie: Amy Poehler (BC grad) and other comedians who started off in the Boston/Chicago improv theatres. If this article is worthy of deletion, so is half of the shit you administrators publish on this site. TeamCopy 23:26, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- My concern was not for whether the person in question is notable, as I tend to avoid that criteria. I was more concerned with the lack of reliable sources, and the only official publication present in the sources confirms a trivial detail. Better sources like newspapers, magazines, or books would do this article a world of good and if they verified the right information(name, place, and activities) would get my vote for a keep. i kan reed 17:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable. Korg (talk) 23:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just delete it then
Why prolong this discussion if clearly the stupid hierarchy of Wikipedia will win out? Delete the damn page already, then. Wikipedia is in no way a credible website; no wonder professors dismiss it as a joke. TeamCopy 23:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete Whatever parallels there may be with other, now notable, persona, the fact remains that this person has currently not achieved these levels. - Tiswas(t/c) 08:52, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.