Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camellia Productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 08:41, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Camellia Productions

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Companies are required to pass WP:NCORP. Please note that this has been sent to draft twice; Draft:Camellia Productions and Draft:Camellia Productions (2) so I don't believe that sending an identical copy there for a third time will achieve anything. The best sources that I can find are Telegraph India and TOI, both of which are passing mentions, failing WP:CORPDEPTH and Spotboye, which publishes the occasional article where a tweet by Camellia Productions is copied and pasted, this violates WP:ORGIND.

This therefore fails the primary criterion of NCORP, which is that A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:04, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:04, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:04, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:04, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Neutral~~Weak delete - I'm not seeing much or any direct coverage, but this place did seem to produce a number of notable films and has a slew of indirect coverage in Indian media. NickCT (talk) 14:05, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The entire article depends on a non-reliable reference YouTube. Multiple attempts to make it live as explained by nominator. I have doubt as creator might be connected with subject or Undisclosed paid. DMySon (talk) 03:56, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable production company, fails WP:NCORP. Bapinghosh (talk) 10:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom and above. Kolma8 (talk) 18:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - just one unreliable reference --Rupertdonovan (talk) 00:44, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.