Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calvin Harris (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:01, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Calvin Harris (album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD & declined {{db-repost}} despite the previous AFD result. No references or reliable sources. Still no indication or assertion of notability, still fail WP:NALBUMS. KTC (talk) 09:16, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. KTC (talk) 09:18, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. no confirmation of the albums title and false information i s included all over the page and the author has added other pages on wikipedia that are false --Mr JKX (talk) 16:11, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Still an unsourced promotional article about a future release. The same author has also created this. --Ben Ben (talk) 12:29, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is an album due later this year but until there are confirmed details there is nothing to justify an article, and there's nothing here that constitutes confirmed details.--Michig (talk) 12:43, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTALBALL. Also, fails WP:GNG, WP:MUSIC. --Nouniquenames (talk) 16:14, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Found no news of this on Calvins official website Seasider91 (talk) 21:03, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article will eventually have reliable sources. For example, Unsupervised was nominated for deletion in December 2011, but eventually, reliable sources were put in. 68.44.51.49 (talk) 00:44, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is essentially summed up in WP:NEXTBIGTHING. --Nouniquenames (talk) 01:31, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, obvious WP:TOOSOON, no verifiable info yet. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:06, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I didn't know about WP:NEXTBIGTHING, but I do feel bad for all the information that will be lost. A solution is to keep the article and find references. Please keep it. 68.44.51.49 (talk) 00:50, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Please see WP:LOSE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nouniquenames (talk • contribs) 12:52, 11 July 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]
  - If you could find some references 68, that would be great. In the mean time, if this article does get deleted, I could mail the content to you if you want, so that it doesn't go to waste. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:09, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I haven't looked very deep, which is why I can't really place an informed !vote, but rather a comment, but I did find http://www.allmusic.com/album/calvin-harris-mw0002306017 (which is part of the reason why I rejected CSD). Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:13, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Given that tracks are being added while this AfD is open, this also looks like Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law. --Nouniquenames (talk) 15:02, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.