Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California 4th Grade Mission Project (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

California 4th Grade Mission Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic of the article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline. Iafisher (talk) 16:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Iafisher (talk) 16:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Iafisher (talk) 16:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm not against a state-wide school project meeting GNG. But it seems like, with the present sourcing, this topic does not. I removed two truly irrelevant sources from the page: they did not even mention the project. The one remaining source https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/California-public-schools-mission-project-model-11953722.php is a local news site, which does not suffice. BenKuykendall (talk) 17:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge. I am not surprised that this may be deleted. But it does occur to me that it is a large bit of curriculum that millions of people have been exposed to, and the development of it, the controversies about it, and the way in which it was terminated would all be of interest to anyone interested in the development of school curriculum. Are there pages about curriculum development? Or about "Controversial topics in education"? For example, I am thinking of

  • teaching about the genocide (or the "not a genocide") of Armenians in Turkey in the early 20th century
  • teaching in the US about the Hindu religion (eg is it a non-theistic religion?)
  • teaching of "pet projects", such as the requirement that one day of instruction in California schools include instruction on Portugese-Americans. This was sponsored by a Portugese-American legislator. And I am sure other states and countries have examples like this.
  • curriculum not included in school, such as (in the US) how to vote.

Are there articles about the how the political or social guides or perhaps distorts curriculum development? RayKiddy (talk) 18:14, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.