Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calendars in the Forgotten Realms

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The "delete" arguments are compelling, and it is unclear what exactly Sariel Xilo thinks could be merged, or based on which sources. Sandstein 15:28, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Calendars in the Forgotten Realms

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks to be completely original research. I can't find third party sources that talk about this with any significance. You could probably take a sentence a calendar, and attribute it to a primary source in the context of a larger notable topic with good third-party sources. Otherwise not notable enough to ever write a good article, about this topic by itself. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:13, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, what next, Tables in the Forgotten Realms? Thoroughly non-notable, as it is sourced in its entirety to a primary source and a Tweet it fails GNG. It also fails WP:PLOT, as it is written entirely from an in-universe perspective. Devonian Wombat (talk) 02:07, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I wouldn't call this Original Research, as I'm pretty sure most of the information here can be found in various official D&D sourcebooks. However, it certainly isn't notable either. There are really no decent reliable, secondary sources that discuss the concept in any way that would pass the WP:GNG. Rorshacma (talk) 02:11, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge selectively to Forgotten Realms. Information like the current game year would be a useful addtion to the Dungeons & Dragons 5th edition section in the FR article. But I can't see how other parts (like the table) could be added in a way that would benefit the FR article. Sariel Xilo (talk) 03:49, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.