Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caleb Prochnow
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Tyrenius (talk) 05:49, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Caleb Prochnow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Has multiple claims to notability, but seems to fall thin on references. The refs provided aren't very good, and no good coverage could be found in a search. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 06:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — "award winning" is only assertion of notability, though no award is stated. The fact that an illustrator has published works does not establish notability. Also, potential WP:COI issue — User:Cmpillustrator made "clean up" edits; possibly the subject of the bio. — ERcheck (talk) 17:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 20:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Just being featured in Spectrum or SI is an award of sorts: they're juried collections in which the top illustrators compete. But it's not enough, I think. I would support keeping an article on an illustrator who wins the Spectrum Grand Master Award (one per year), the SI Hamilton King Award (one per year), or is listed in the SI Hall of Fame (~3 per year) but he's not yet in that class. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:20, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.