Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caitlin Brunell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:15, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Caitlin Brunell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing in RS except simple news reports of her winning a beauty pageant. Fails GNG. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 23:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 19:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable winner of a copetition as a teenager.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:12, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:12, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• The nominator was blocked as a sockpuppet, however I am leaving the nomination open because it has some merit. MER-C 17:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• weak Keep - sources gives merits correct. WP:GNG applies. drive-by !vote for Delete above gives no rationale what so ever.BabbaQ (talk) 22:53, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - a winner of a major beauty pageant that has multiple independent sources shows notability. --11:26, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.