Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cagayan Heritage Conservation Society

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – bradv🍁 00:06, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cagayan Heritage Conservation Society

Cagayan Heritage Conservation Society (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage per Notability (Non-commercial Organizations) and possible COI. Allenjambalaya (talk) 13:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Allenjambalaya (talk) 13:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Allenjambalaya (talk) 13:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment 3 of 4 sources in the article have tags suggesting dead links, but here is one of those sources, or a new source: "500 join heritage walk through antique houses in Cagayan, by Villamor Visaya, Jr., April 5, 2019, published by Philippine News Agency. And other sources turn up in my quick searching. If this is a local historical society, perhaps it could be covered in a row in a table of similar ones in a list-article. Hmm, that would be expanding coverage (it is already mentioned) at List of historical societies#Philippines societies. So a merger to there is a possibility, a good wp:ATD. --Doncram (talk) 21:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I found a few articles about the NGO: [1], [2] and [3]. I believe those, along with Doncram's link, are reliable enough to make the article close to passing WP:NGO. My vote stands. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 04:33, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as WP:TOOSOON. Not enough independent coverage of the NGO (only two that are valid), the size of the organization and age (barely 2 years) dont help establish notability for this local NGO either. At least, for now.--RioHondo (talk) 09:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Found some more articles on this small group:

• Comment @Jbuigat: Hello! It took you a long time to reply to the discussion. You haven't fixed the reference links yet. I fixed some of them but I cannot foud them. And where are the articles you are mentioning? And since this is a small group, you should prove that there is enough coverage per Notability (Non-commercial Organizations) and declare that you, as the creator of the article, does not violate the COI. If you are having trouble answering this issues, please put a new section on the Wikipedia_talk:Tambayan_Philippines and ask for help. I think some will gladly help you there. —Allenjambalaya (talk) 07:46, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Fixed the dead links. My vote still stays. Aside from COI and not enough coverage per Notability (Non-commercial Organizations), I agree with the WP:TOOSOON.—Allenjambalaya (talk) 12:13, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep - technically there are two reliable sources with in-depth reporting about this NGO, but it just seems so local. This area in the Northeast of Luzon, the Philippines is isolated, and likely to remain so. Bearian (talk) 00:21, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.