Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caelike

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 12:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Caelike

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

appearing in an award show doesn't make someone notable, similarly neither do any other claims here and I can find nothing in depth about her. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

she is one of the most followed people on YouTube in Latin America according to google. There's thousand of articles about her on the internet. 2600:6C50:27F:A79E:D5DB:1D47:270C:CDAE (talk) 19:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sharing a few of these articles from reliable sources would strengthen your argument to keep this page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be no article on es.wiki. PamD 07:23, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Internet, and Mexico. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:10, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we lack the indepdent reliable secondary sources that give indepth coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:12, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If kept, move: no evidence for use of title "Caelike", needs to be at Caeli (YouTuber) or similar. PamD 07:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There seems to be some coverage of her in Spanish and I have added some of these sources to the page. If an editor who understands that language could comment on whether it is substantial and if the sources are reliable, it would be much appreciated. Also, seconding PamD's comment about moving to Caeli (YouTuber) or similar. Samsmachado (talk) 15:41, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:32, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:42, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: the sort of sources I'm seeing in the article and through a search ([1][2][3][4]) are media outlets describing YouTube drama or misogynistically drooling over her. The second paragraph of "Career" at present is very dubious under BLP: it accuses a named person of a crime based on media speculation, and accuses a different name person of "flirting with" a person in a monogamous relationship.

There's the MTV Millennial Award and a cover for Penthouse, but I've not found the substantial coverage about her channel or her life to justify a standalone article. — Bilorv (talk) 08:15, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per Bilorv's source analysis and concerns about accusations. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:34, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.