Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caballero Universal

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. JBW (talk) 21:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Caballero Universal

Caballero Universal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, with only one reliable source and no other clear sources online. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 06:15, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Through a quick search, I found several other sources in Spanish about the pageant: [1][2][3][4][5] While some of them are passing mentions, especifically about Spain's candidate Pablo Estrada, there seems to be more coverage than suggested. --NoonIcarus (talk) 09:22, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for finding these sources. The last one is a tourism office, not sure if that is reliable, whilst source one is largely an interview. I can't access source four due to an ad blocker that I can't be bothered to disable, and two and three just don't pass WP:SIGCOV. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 09:39, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:48, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep per my previous comment, as it seems that the article meets WP:GNG by a small margin. I think this is even more understandable given how recent the contest is, although on the other hand this could mean a case of WP:TOOSOON. If other editors agree that the page does not meet the threshold, the article can be deleted. --NoonIcarus (talk) 12:44, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:10, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:34, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.