Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C8H3NO

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:52, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

C8H3NO

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page would only work as a molecular formula disambiguation page, but there are currently no Wikipedia articles on chemicals with the chemically unlikely molecular formula C8H3NO, so this page is unneeded. The text contains no information that cannot be derived from the chemical formula itself (and the "scientific name" given is nonsense). ChemNerd (talk) 17:17, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails to establish notability, not a named compound, and copies the text wholesale from its source. Noir (talk) 17:43, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. May have been synthesized at some point (as 1-isocyanatohepta-1,3,5-triyne). However, no one has ever appeared to care, and there's sub-minimal references available. Note that the two "references" given in the article are both molecular weight calculators that will do their thing given any formula, regardless of whether it's a notable molecule ... or even a nonexistent one. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 17:38, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, there has never been a CAS number assigned to 1-isocyanatohepta-1,3,5-triyne, so no one has cared about this stuff since before 1957, if anyone ever did. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 17:45, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Extremely non-notable. Doesn't appear to refer to any chemical with any applications or scientific interest. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:13, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:08, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.