Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. Anandharamakrishnan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Lourdes 14:28, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

C. Anandharamakrishnan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to pass WP:GNG. (I'm stuck using Bing where I am, so maybe there are sources out there. I just cannot find more than one.) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:03, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:49, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 05:25, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 05:25, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Being elected as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry is enough to satisfy "person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level" (WP:NACADEMIC). WWGB (talk) 05:14, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, basically per WWGB, except that they are citing the wrong WP:PROF criterion. The right one is #C3, "The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association". His citation counts on Google scholar are also plausibly enough for a very weak pass of #C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:04, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Just passes WP:Prof#C1. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.