Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buyer agent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Buyer brokerage. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:57, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Buyer agent

Buyer agent (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded because deprodder felt I failed to do WP:BEFORE, but I was unable to find any sources to expand this beyond a WP:DICDEF. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:24, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:05, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- The customary term is buyer's agent. The article is not ready for prime time. In the real world, a single reference from HUD is not enough. The law of agency and real property requires a much deeper exposition. Rhadow (talk) 19:41, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Buyer's agent exists as a redirect to Buyer brokerage, I see. The omission of the apostrophe would seem to be a reasonable typo for a search term, no? Should we simply redirect? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Buyer brokerage as preferred WP:ATD. ~Kvng (talk) 15:18, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.