Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business Jet Traveler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Newslinger talk 09:22, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Business Jet Traveler

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing nomination on behalf of User:TheLongTone, who offered no rationale. My read is that the article has no sources to indicate notability, and none are apparent in my searches. Further, the tone of the article suggests an attempt at promotion, which would fall afoul of several of our guidelines. I'll message TheLongTone to come here and provide additional commentary on their rationale. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 13:35, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, fat finger syndrome. Notability (both sources self published).TheLongTone (talk) 00:08, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All good - that's why we have WP:BADAFD. No worries. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 16:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:30, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:46, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 06:25, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.