Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burda (surname)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:15, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Burda (surname)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

100% original research despite numerous footnotes. The refs are either for similarly sounding names or to primary sourtces, or to tangential facts Staszek Lem (talk)

Delete Looks like a clear cut case of 100% fresh WP:OR, the article uses databases of immigrants to draw conclusions about the origin of a surname, and doesn't back up anything else with citations. SWL36 (talk) 20:16, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:24, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. It has failed to meet the burda of proof that it is notable. (I am so going to pun hell.) If there were anything salvageable (which seems unlikely), it could go in Burda, which I've reclassified from a dab page to a surname one. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:09, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.