Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bugoy Cariño

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 23:12, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bugoy Cariño

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Child television actor, no significant media coverage. Chick Bowen 17:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "Just because" the subject is a child actor does not merit deletion. The subject has appeared prominently in TV dramas on ~~GMA Network~~ ABS-CBN in the Philippines, which is valid enough for notability. Starczamora (talk) 08:30, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails WP:N + article is wholly unsourced. Irredeemable. – Shannon Rose ^Talk 19:15, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:28, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 02:46, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't see "significant roles in multiple notable films"—which is not surprising, since he's only nine. Contrary to the claim above, his appearances appear to be small parts, not "prominent" roles, and a search for news or other significant coverage in reliable sources comes up with [two extremely passing mentions] and really nothing else. Glenfarclas (talk) 01:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.