Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Bell and Burke Gleason "I Know Who You Are"

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Also recreation of previously-speedy deleted page. Neutrality^talk 06:21, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bryan Bell and Burke Gleason "I Know Who You Are"

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure if this is a sort of worldbuilding exercise, the beginning of a secret history of Atlantis, a utopian fiction, or suggestions for the President's Panel for a Cleaner Tomorrow. Regardless, whatever it is, it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. I wish there was a CSD category for masterpieces like this, but it's not even clear this is meant to be a hoax—after all, somebody could sincerely be summarizing some kind of short story here. Regardless, for your pleasure, here's Bryan Bell and Burke Gleason's "I Know Who You Are." — Chromancer ^talk/_cont 23:41, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is some kind of essay and calling it original research gives it too much credit. It could be the work of a provocateur or some kind of social experiment. It certainly isn't a valid Wikipedia article. Cullen328 (talk) 01:04, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MADEUP and a variety of sections of WP:NOT. Deor (talk) 01:08, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The very first sentence is "In 2020 the natural disasters come to a boiling point in which the lost city of Atlantis rises to the surface in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean explaining how many early civilizations could have resembled each other so closely." This is fantasy, not an encyclopedia article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:04, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm going for the option "background scenario for a role-playing game someone was making up - said game possibly including the use of dice of more than 6 sides" - but per nom, this isn't the place for it.FlowerpotmaN·(t) 23:49, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This either fiction or a summary of a work of fiction.--TeraRose (talk) 03:44, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.