Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brunel Classic Gold

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 17:24, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brunel Classic Gold

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable radio station, fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 15:02, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. sst✈^discuss 15:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. sst✈^discuss 15:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Derek Andrews (talk) 15:17, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Carries network audio except for 4 hours per week. NN. Szzuk (talk) 15:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Classic Gold Digital Network?, with maybe a mention at Classic Gold Digital Network#Regional stations? All the rebranding and lack of citations make this difficult to understand and present clearly. With a redirect the information here is available as a starting for anyone who wants to find references and expand it in a clearer manner at a later date. Derek Andrews (talk) 15:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's the problem there is no sources and to be totally honestly If redirected it won't ever be improved anyway, I usually prefer redirect but in this case IMHO it's pointless. –Davey2010^Talk 23:18, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom and Szzuk. Nothing shows the notability of this station. Also agree with Davey2010's rationale regarding a redirect. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.