Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Wilson (Democratic booster)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:49, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Wilson (Democratic booster)

Bruce Wilson (Democratic booster) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prominent local figure, multiple mentions in same local paper, but I didn't think it was enough to meet WP:GNG, WP:POLITICIAN or any other aspect of WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 10:32, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete concur with nom. County level activist, insufficient to meet WP:GNG, and no other claim to notability expressed in article. Only coverage is in local newspaper (Columbia, MO), a city of around 100k. MB 01:56, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete local political fundraisers need better sources to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- an unremarkable politica insider, nothing else. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:39, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.