Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brother (UK band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Mandsford 00:13, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brother (UK band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:MUSIC. ttonyb (talk) 14:40, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Seriously? They were cover stars in the NME on the 8th of January with three pages devoted to them, plus coverage in The Guardian, stereoboard, NME interview, The Quietus.--Michig (talk) 20:30, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per the references given by Michig, per WP:BITE and per subject meeting the general notability guideline. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 00:21, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. They have received a huge amount of press, TV coverage on Channel 4 and significant coverage from BBC Radio 1 including during the daytime. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Digimox (talk • contribs) 14:07, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is this page as well http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brother_(Britpop_band) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Digimox (talk • contribs) 15:05, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.