Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brookfield Schools

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:08, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brookfield Schools

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any sources because the schools' website and pages where people review schools. It is mentioned a few time in articles about the town, but has no significant coverage. —Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 19:39, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:23, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There's a longstanding consensus that high schools (and above) are kept; here's a NJESD lawsuit, academic and qualitative data and presentation, public funding rates, listing as a specialized clinic, which is enough to me to prove it exists; as a school serving various groups of special needs it certainly isn't going to have as big of a profile as public schools. tedder (talk) 09:29, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per reasons and potential sources to improve the article cited by Tedder. Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 10:14, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I have added content and citations that I believe adequately establish notability for this stub article. Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 19:27, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Following the additions by Grand'mere Eugene, I then went and made a number of changes and additions such as adding an Infobox, NCES stats, expanded history, categories etc - see this diff (added logo on next edit) No longer a stub now Steven (Editor) (talk) 05:29, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I had looked at the article shortly after the AfD was created and saw an article that merited retention, but needed to be expanded with reliably and verifiably sourced material. That standard has been met with the article as it currently stands. Alansohn (talk) 12:48, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.