Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Raj" on Wikipedia
- WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reason: The article for the main part is not about the British Raj but rather Indian independence along with a whole load...8 KB (926 words) - 17:26, 18 February 2023
- atrocities of British Raj in wikipedia related articles. Anyone should feel free to look at my edit history and tell me if I have touched a single British related...29 KB (3,472 words) - 02:03, 20 February 2023
- page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-11 09:29Z British Raj Indian Restaurant...3 KB (319 words) - 11:30, 10 February 2022
- 00:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC) Contributions attributed to British colonials and British Raj in modern India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...10 KB (998 words) - 03:15, 12 March 2022
- September 2005 (UTC) I don't think the article is encyclopedic. 'Licence Raj' is more of a term coined by individuals than a phenomenon and the outcome...3 KB (409 words) - 12:15, 7 February 2023
- The year 1966 doesn't belong to British era, neither does the author Kumar Suresh Singh, How is this a 'British Raj source' then and hence unreliable...18 KB (2,289 words) - 04:34, 17 March 2023
- rationale at the AfD for the Nutkani article in the last hour or so. For the record, again, by long-standing consensus British Raj sources are not reliable...13 KB (1,578 words) - 04:57, 20 March 2022
- sources (WP:RAJ) that are based on British-based work, assumptions or mythological beliefs and that are not allowed on Wikipedia please see WP:RAJ. This article...9 KB (1,253 words) - 21:56, 4 September 2023
- 13, 2005 (UTC) This is just a cut-and-paste of three paragraphs from British Raj. Delete or redirect to that article. --194.73.130.132 10:34, 7 Apr 2005...2 KB (260 words) - 11:21, 24 April 2006
- on unreliable sources from the Raj era. Please see [1] and this noticeboard discussion for the problems with British Raj sources. They should generally...14 KB (1,807 words) - 00:02, 24 April 2020
- known for works on the Moghul Empire. He was in British India from 1863 to 1889." Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC) Raj-era sources...8 KB (1,015 words) - 13:38, 31 August 2021
- (discussion link) that some British Raj sources may be unreliable. I found this source, which appears to be a raj source, and other such raj-era sources exist....7 KB (514 words) - 14:27, 25 March 2023
- suzerain, the British Raj. As user:Sitush remarks, the princes irrevocably and legally lost their states (and reigns) in 1947 when the Raj ended and India...6 KB (668 words) - 02:01, 5 June 2022
- sources (WP:RAJ) that are based on British-based work, assumptions or mythological beliefs and that are not allowed on Wikipedia please see WP:RAJ. This article...5 KB (575 words) - 21:57, 4 September 2023
- and the sources are unreliable and relies heavily on WP:Raj sources. The page requires deletion. Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded...5 KB (429 words) - 06:41, 20 May 2024
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 172#Are British Raj ethnographers unreliable?. This page is unsuitable for a redirect/merge unless we have actual reliable...8 KB (718 words) - 14:36, 8 February 2023
- published in 1940 by "Government Printing" (link), but this may be a British Raj source, which some on Wikipedia consider to be unreliable regarding clans...6 KB (521 words) - 01:34, 14 February 2019
- soldiers,then Hindu medieval rulers and finally soldiers who fought for the British Raj and the Indian army.A hell of an article!Aru@baska❯❯❯ Vanguard 11:12...7 KB (649 words) - 01:15, 4 May 2022
- are no sources for this as a tribe other than mirrors and the hopelessly unreliable H. A. Rose, an amateur ethnologist of the British Raj era. WALTHAM2 (talk ·...15 KB (1,947 words) - 15:01, 13 May 2022
- January 2018 (UTC) @FloridaArmy: what other sources? If they're from the British Raj era, they're not reliable. Your mention above is just that, ie: a mention...7 KB (540 words) - 03:18, 13 February 2022
- dictionary. The meaning of words remain the same. American English, and British English are different dialects of the same language. J.A.R.N.Y🗣 00:38