Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britannia Pub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:55, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Britannia Pub (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is NOT a notable business. Please see the history for the content and sources I just removed--they contain such trivia as "there was outdoor dining during COVID" and cite books like this commercial/promotional publication. There really is no in-depth sourcing from anything above the local level. Drmies (talk) 00:54, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Business, and California. TJMSmith (talk) 01:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Absolutely nothing I found meets WP:ORGCRIT that isn't local press. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:44, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Yet another generic local business with only routine coverage and minor listicle mentions in local news. It's not encylopedic to catalogue brief local event listings like [1] or the fact that bars host karaoke or put sports on TV. It's likewise inappropriate to copy the entirety of a travel guide's two-sentence review: sure this is one of 24 bars and pubs catalogued in it, but we're not here to collate that sort of short, routine listing. Reywas92^Talk 22:36, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Article has been bombed with references. Even though many of the references are highly reliable, the coverage is not significant. Much coverage contains only a trivial passing mention. Insufficient to meet the subject specific notability guideline. MaxnaCarta (talk) 23:59, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - does not meet CORPDEPTH.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:37, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.