Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brigit Kelly Young

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:16, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brigit Kelly Young

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable writer lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Article lacks references to support notability. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:AUTHOR. ttonyb (talk) 20:38, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable, suggest extra spanking for SPA that removed the speedy. Hairhorn (talk) 20:48, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No further comment. JBsupreme (talk) 20:55, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this author. Joe Chill (talk) 21:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete seems to fail the relevant notability criteria. Bfigura ^(talk) 01:17, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I can't find significant coverage or anything else to support a claim under WP:AUTHOR. Glenfarclas (talk) 01:33, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.