Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Lowdermilk
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 01:46, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Brian Lowdermilk
- Brian Lowdermilk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
insufficient or questionable notability - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If there are better sources for notability, I'll withdrawl, but the prod was removed without discussion. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk
Weak Delete Google search of "Brian Lowdermilk" has a few hits, but even so I don't see most of them as reliable, notability is questionble as well. If reliable sources are added, I may change my opinion Frank Anchor Talk to me (R-OH) 18:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Changed to Keep per addition of sources and revisions to the page. Frank Anchor Talk to me (R-OH) 01:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I added two sources, one of which is more reliable than the other. The article is nowhere near GA, but I think notability is established well enough. -Seidenstud (talk) 18:31, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, he's clearly won at least one notable award, the Richard Rodgers Award from the American Academy of Arts and Letters (one of two 2005 winners; note this isn't the better-known ASCAP Foundation sponsored award, but I still think it's notable). --Dhartung | Talk 19:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sources added since AfD was started now assert notability. GaryColemanFan (talk) 00:13, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as it is now, he is clearly notable. --Doug Weller (talk) 18:17, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep reliable sources assert notability. --Captain-tucker (talk) 09:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.