Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Francis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Francis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not finding any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Run-of-the-mill businesswoman. Edwardx (talk) 21:32, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:51, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:51, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:51, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:52, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:52, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:54, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, clearly WP:PROMOTION. Fifthavenuebrands (talk) 13:12, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Writers and public speakers are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, but this is not referenced to the depth of reliable source coverage about her that it would take to get her over WP:AUTHOR or even WP:GNG. By far the majority of the footnotes here are primary sources which are not support for notability at all, and the few that are reliable source coverage in real media are entirely local coverage in local contexts (like attending luncheons) in Saskatoon and Swift Current, not evincing the geographic range needed to make her notable enough for an international encyclopedia. Bearcat (talk) 15:46, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and the above discussion. Aoba47 (talk) 19:14, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete clearly is an promotional article. مضحرالعجایب (talk) 17:55, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete an overly promotional article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Clearly a case of WP:PROMO. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 06:51, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. A search yielded no independent coverage. Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 19:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.