Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bret Wolfe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 06:21, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bret Wolfe

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:NACTOR: None of the sources currently in the article constitute significant coverage in reliable sources. I looked for new ones and found only two interviews. (I haven't listened to the podcast one.) I don't believe Mr. Wolfe's industry awards count towards anything either, now that PORNBIO has been deprecated. His roles in non-pornographic films and plays (listed in his resume) do not appear significant. Cheers, gnu 57 06:15, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 06:15, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 06:15, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:48, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:48, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:49, 4 November 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Delete: does not meet WP:BASIC / WP:ENT. --K.e.coffman (talk) 18:59, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Independent reliable sources appear to have nothing to say about this person, especially nothing to support WP:BASIC or WP:ENT notability. Even in the later phases of PORNBIO, it would have been a stretch for him to pass the "well-known and significant" test. • Gene93k (talk) 22:17, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable pornographic performer. It is time to get rid of the glut of articles on such people.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.