Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brentwood Elementary School
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. I wouldn't know what to usefully merge, but for those who do, the text is available on request. I think there would be little objection to creating a redirect here, either. Sandstein 17:36, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Brentwood Elementary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Was tagged for speedy as nocontext, made into a redirect, and restored to the form that was originally speedied with no improvement. Unsourced substub on an elementary school of questionable notability. Principal Schoolswatter 18:21, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable. Jayden54 20:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, practically an empty article aside from the infobox. Directory, unsourced, etc. Would not object in principle to a merge/redirect, though it seems that's already been tried. Shimeru 21:08, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Mead School District. There's barely any other info, anyway. -- Kicking222 02:15, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect to Mead School District, although other than the name of the principal and mascot, there is no content in this article above directory information, so in essence I'm voting Redirect. A search of Google and the Google News Archive did not turn up anything noteworthy about the school. Alansohn 17:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no evidence of notability, remarkability (or even existence) in the article. As Shimeru mentioned above, a redirect is not objectionable but was reverted before. --Kuzaar-T-C- 18:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete/Merge to the schooldistrict. No claim of notability, no sources. Edison 20:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep No redlinks. "Notability" should be defined differently for elementary schools than for colleges and universities. Kukini 15:03, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- What does that mean? The first part "no redlinks" seems like some sort of mantra. Of course there are two ways of dealing with redlinks other than keeping: 1) delinking links and 2) making redirects. So even if we supported your mantra there are ways of handling it. As to your second point that "Notability" should be defined differently for elementary schools than for colleges and universities what precisely do you want? JoshuaZ 05:31, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I do not recall any "mantra." I do feel that any verifiable school should be included. I realize that this is more "inclusionist" than "deletionist" in nature, but it is how I feel. Why do you get upset when another editor does not see this issue the same as you? I am only one vote in many. -Kukini 06:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Debate and discussion is the purpose of AFD discussions. Not a thing is wrong with engaging other users and causing people to think about their positions, in my opinion. Much of the time both sides come out thinking more clearly about what their opinions are and why they hold them. :) --Kuzaar-T-C- 16:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I do not recall any "mantra." I do feel that any verifiable school should be included. I realize that this is more "inclusionist" than "deletionist" in nature, but it is how I feel. Why do you get upset when another editor does not see this issue the same as you? I am only one vote in many. -Kukini 06:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- disambiguate per Alan. My only issue is that a google search shows that there are at least three schools of this name, so I would go for considering making this a dab page with the entry for the Mead school to go to the Mead district. On the other hand, does it make sense having a dab to three non-notable schools? I don't know. JoshuaZ 05:31, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- What does that mean? The first part "no redlinks" seems like some sort of mantra. Of course there are two ways of dealing with redlinks other than keeping: 1) delinking links and 2) making redirects. So even if we supported your mantra there are ways of handling it. As to your second point that "Notability" should be defined differently for elementary schools than for colleges and universities what precisely do you want? JoshuaZ 05:31, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- redirect/disambig I gotta go with Alan and Joshua on this one... its just not got any info worth keeping. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 07:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn school. Eusebeus 10:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no assertion of notability. —ptk✰fgs 22:49, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to Mead School District per Kicking222. Silensor 06:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. NN. WMMartin 18:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.