Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brendan Filone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep;non-admin closure; fraudulent nomination. J04n(talk page) 19:41, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brendan Filone

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

sorry mister but this is stupid. now i know the rumor that the show hasnt been the same since he was raped and murdered but this fails notabulity rules. ok there's OTHER rules but just takes the whole bakery. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.137.4.7 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete yeah, I was just browsing through and noticed this crap right here. 166.137.6.134 (talk) 21:46, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In spite of the sincerity of this nomination, I will have to say deletion. wow, there was nothing like this when I was on wiki three years ago. Well, bye. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lord Freeza (talk • contribs) 15:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

— Lord Freeza (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Note: this AFD was improperly created, I moved and transcluded it today. tedder (talk) 17:35, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Noting that the nominator has no policy rationale, and the SPA's are offering much the same, it seems that this is vandalism. Angryapathy (talk) 17:52, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep The nominator is yet another sockpuppet of the aforementioned ip address. For further information on this matter, please refer to this administrator talk page where I further bring up this issue. - Zarbon (talk) 18:18, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. Phony nomination rationale. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.