Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brant Hansen
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 01:38, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Brant Hansen
- Brant Hansen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No assertion of notability of subject- most sources on web (not cited in article) appear to be social networks and/or promotional sites. Qxukhgiels (talk) 14:50, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Hansen is a national, syndicated, award-winning radio show host. I do agree that there is plenty of opportunity for more information and better sources to be added to this article, but there is some information out there outside the social network spectrum. I have added some additional material (including reference to several awards Hansen has won) and some citations to help clean things up a bit. Omgee (talk) 23:27, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:27, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:27, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 13:37, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as a nationally-syndicated radio host with coverage in reliable third-party sources, crossing the verifiability and notability thresholds. - Dravecky (talk) 09:12, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:16, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.