Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brainjam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Scott Burley (talk) 20:37, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brainjam

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references Rathfelder (talk) 20:29, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 20:29, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, absolutely no sourcing found. Only 20 google results for Martin Wolfende + Brainjam, nothing on GBooks. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:34, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unsourced and I cannot find anything even remotely resembling a reliable source in my own search. -- Whpq (talk) 14:02, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.