Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Braepark, Edinburgh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:25, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Braepark, Edinburgh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not a suburb just a small neighbourhood in Edinburgh fails to meet WP:GNG 1keyhole (talk) 13:10, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Scotland. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:13, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep unlike Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westfield, Edinburgh this is an OS settlement[1] and is in the Gazetteer for Scotland. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:56, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
delete we don't just keep every name on an official map in the US and I see no reason not to do the same in the UK. Searches give no indication of any notability; almost everything is a real estate listing or routine governmental material. Mangoe (talk) 03:39, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:34, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Don't think WP:GEOLAND applies as although populated there is lack of evidence of it being legally recognised. Did consider a redirect/merge to Cramond as it was ~~/(is?)~~ in that parish; however that article concentrates on the coastal Cramond village and looks fairly self-contained. Braepark to the south of Cramond village appears to be the name now in use for the area of an historic estate called Braehead. The article could be expanded with detail on the Braehead Estate [2], the Cramond Old Bridge [3] and the Braehead Mains statue [4]. The article would also be a good reciprocal link to William Houison Craufurd of Braehead. In summary, there's definite potential for this article from a historical angle so I believe a Keep opinion is justified. (If there was nothing to expand the article with and Braepark was merely a modern housing estate on former agricultural land, I would have !voted delete.) Rupples (talk) 23:31, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Taken a further look at this and decided to withdraw Keep !vote. AFAICS Edinburgh Council do not refer to Braepark as a separate neighbourhood. The historical interest features I referred to above are included within a part of Cramond Conservation Area named Cramond Brig. The name "Braepark" only seems to be referenced in property sales. GNG is not satisfied for the name "Braepark". May be best to add the historical detail to Cramond after all. Not sure even a redirect for "Braepark" is required. Rupples (talk) 03:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:35, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not legally recognized so fails WP:GEOLAND, cannot find SIRS sources so fails WP:GNG. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} 05:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No coverage in any news or reliable source except for real estate listing. Fails WP:GNG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CaribbeanKing (talk • contribs) 15:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.