Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley Ho

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:A7. Article about a real person, containing no indication of importance. Euryalus (talk) 09:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley Ho

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

18 year old student with Youtube-channel whose claim to fame is that he was voted "most likely to succeed online" in school yearbook. Travelbird (talk) 12:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 12:26, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 12:26, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete all links are to Reddit.--Theredproject (talk) 16:55, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all sources are from Reddit, which is definitely not the most reliable of sources. Based on the fact that the channel also only has 61 subscribers, I would not consider that "famous" as the Reddit threads state. I also went through all 5 pages of Google results for "TheOmegaLeaf" and "Bradley Ho" (had more than 5 pages, none appeared to be RS & related), only to discover no reliable sources. Additionally (in the case of the former), Google's news tab does not return anything. While I would certainly not rule out the fact that he could become famous tomorrow (anyone could, just odds are against it) - and if that was the case and tonnes of reliable sources suddenly pop up that weren't there when I did the search, I would happily change my !vote - I do not think that there is enough notability to warrant an article at this time and if it were sent through AfC and I reviewed it, it would most definitely have been declined. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 22:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Theredproject and TheSandDoctor. SportingFlyer (talk) 03:59, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.