Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Kavanagh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn with consensus to keep, and a trout for the nom (just kidding). Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:43, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brad Kavanagh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Contested prod, an actor who does not appear to meet the notability criteria. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:06, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep Meets criteria of WP:ENTERTAINER - significant roles on TV and stage. Quite a few internet sources: 1, 2 and 3. StephenBuxton (talk) 16:26, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Clear keep google comes up with sources as StephenBuxton stated above (add those to external links) plus [1]. --neonwhite user page talk 16:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Seems clear that he is notable in Britain. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 17:08, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Per WP:ENTERTAINER, I believe there is notability. WilliamH (talk) 17:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Retraction from nom. Okay, okay, I messed up. It was a one-sentence article about a teenage actor, and I mistook it for another of those selfpromotional non-notable articles. I'm a bad, bad person. Spank me. Or send Salma Hayek to do it, if you're too busy. I withdraw the nomination, and thank those who found the sources. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:15, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.