Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bouloussou family

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 01:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bouloussou family

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable political family. The patriarch, Bouloussou Soubramanion Sastroulou, might meet notability standards but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. None of the sourcing appears to be about the actual family the sourcing that is not about the previously mentioned Bouloussou Soubramanion Sastroulou are either membership lists, government surveys, or the papers written by the "Fourth Generation" member, who happens to be the person who wrote this article. I had previously tried to draftify the article, but was unsuccessful. GPL93 (talk) 22:27, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 22:27, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 22:27, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable, not written well at all, has no proper sourcing. Just another messy and unnecessary India article. Yeah, there's a lot here. Mostly schools and stuff. AdoTang (talk) 22:39, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While as the nominator I obviously believe that the article should be deleted, the subject being from India is irrelevant. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:41, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quite. We shouldn't write off a sixth of the world's population by prejudice, but judge articles about them by the same standards that we use for articles about British or American subjects. If we ever get to the stage where more than a sixth of our articles are about India then I may believe that they are a particular problem. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:15, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.