Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bou Keng Wan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 18:36, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No context provided, despite requests to author on article & user talk pages. Appears to be fiction. Klaw ¡digame! 04:52, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Appears to be a Storm raider character, which is a notable Chinese comic series to the best of my understanding. I couldn't find a Storm Raider article on WP, so context could be an issue. KillerChihuahua^?!? 04:55, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is Storm Raider the same as Fung Wan (Tin Ha comic series) ? Kappa 04:59, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • Those character names can't be a coincidence. But do the characters merit their own articles, esp. when the comic's main article is just a stub? (Which I'm tagging now.) | Klaw ¡digame! 05:03, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge keep Yes, looks like Fung Wan (Tin Ha comic series) is the comic in question. A reidrect would have helped me. Suggest move this content to the Fung Wan (Tin Ha comic series) article, put in redirect from Bou Keng Wan to Fung Wan (Tin Ha comic series). Keeps the content and adds the context. Do the same with Nip Fung. KillerChihuahua^?!? 05:09, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • OTOH, Mou Ming is a well-developed article. Needs wikifying tho. KillerChihuahua^?!? 05:12, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Note that there are two other character articles that this user contributed: Nip Fung and Mou Ming. And this user did significant editting on Fung Wan (Tin Ha comic series), so the user's obviously interested in the topic. The last contribution was less than 10 minutes after I left the note on the user's talk page, so may I suggest holding off for a bit and seeing if the user can contribute more fully next time he/she logs in? --_└ ^Smith120bh/_TALK^┐ 05:13, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• changed vote to Keep pending what the primary editor does - Mou Ming and Fung Wan articles are well developed. KillerChihuahua^?!? 05:16, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, it's already a good article, and about a primary character in a major comic series. Kappa 05:37, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• keep please kappa is right here Yuckfoo 21:11, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.