Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bootlegger Crossing, Arizona

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bootlegger Crossing, Arizona

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG due to lack of significant coverage. No evidence that this is or was a populated place. –dlthewave ☎ 21:38, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 21:38, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 21:38, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Even if it weren't actually a locale, there's nothing establishing notability. There are scores of these mass-produced false permastubs, let's do a few bulk noms. Reywas92^Talk 22:16, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NGEO and WP:GEOLAND. Reywas92 is correct about the need for bulk. Lightburst (talk) 22:43, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The coords given are off a bit. This is the name of the place were Garland Prairie Road crosses the BNSF railroad tracks. See this. Definitely not a populated place; no other indication of notability for GNG. No obvious place for redirect. MB 00:12, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Covered here as a place of death, here as the site of a train accident, here as a site of a murder, here as a recent example of its use on the railroad, and [1] shows it's a place name in very recent use by the Forest Service. Probably doesn't need to be deleted, but it's more fun to be in an angry mob, so here we are. SportingFlyer T·C 10:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the name is used to identify the spot where a road crosses the train tracks. No more unusual than millions of names of streets, buildings, etc. where things happen also yet those places don't meet GNG either. MB 14:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete,The article dose not meet WP:GNG, Alex-h (talk) 15:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Unsure about this one. More research is needed. Bearian (talk) 17:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Listing a place does not make it notable. PenulisHantu (talk) 05:22, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.