Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Books of Malory Towers written by Pamela Cox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (Pamela Cox and The Third Form at St. Clare's have both been redirected, but this title seems too unlikely as a search term to redirect to Malory Towers. If anyone disagrees, go ahead and create the redirect.) Deor (talk) 17:27, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books of Malory Towers written by Pamela Cox

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly referenced, no indication of notability per WP:NBOOKS, no significant coverage online from WP:RS. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamela Cox and WP:Articles for deletion/The Third Form at St. Clare's. OnionRing (talk) 12:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 12:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability. Maproom (talk) 08:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It might be worthwhile to create a subsection for Cox in Blyton's article since she's continuing two of the author's series. Cox doesn't seem to be independently notable outside of being a ghostwriter for Blyton, but there's merit in having a small mention of her picking up the series' reigns. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is something like this already at Malory Towers#Books, thought it's currently unreferenced. It could be referenced and expanded. OnionRing (talk) 09:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking more of just a general overview of Cox since she's working on two of Blyton's series, Malory Towers and The Third Form at St. Clare's. It would really be more of a few brief sentences akin to how V. C. Andrews's ghostwriter is mentioned in her article. I don't think Cox merits her own article at this point in time, but I think that covering her somewhere (and giving a redirect) might deter future attempts to create articles about her specifically. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:04, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this, and put section in Blyton article per Tokyogirl79. White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 21:10, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. She's now mentioned at Enid_Blyton#Ghost_writing. I don't think that there's any reason for a redirect for this specific title, given how clunky it is. I'll make a redirect for Cox, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:47, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as certainly nothing for its own actual article, nothing else convincing as this all speaks for itself. SwisterTwister talk 17:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: agree that what has been done (redirect) is all that can be done. No individual notability for this article exists. Fylbecatulous talk 16:07, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.