Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bodies in argumentation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:31, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bodies in argumentation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable concept (the term "Bodies in argumentation" appears nowhere outside of Wikipedia). No objection to the creation of articles on Kevin DeLuca or Unruly Arguments if they merit such, but to have an originally-titled page about a single section of a (probably) non-notable article by a (possibly)non-notable academic is putting the cart way, way before the horse. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:NFT/WP:SOAP and maybe WP:NOT#OR. If there were articles on the author or the publication, then this should be redirected to it, probably without merger given this is unsourced. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 15:33, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:36, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete violates WP:OR and WP:SYN Curb Chain (talk) 23:04, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.