Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobby Laurie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 16:58, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Laurie

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant advertising. Brief 1-2 sentence "interviews" and sitting through various talkshows does not establish notability. Created and expanded almost entirely by SPA accounts. GermanJoe (talk) 00:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:21, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - A quick Google search of his name reveals his association and/or employment with CNN Airport Network as a travel expert, WFLA-TV in Tampa as a travel correspondent, a published and on the market publication through Amazon and notes he's a blogger for the Huffington Post. Also he produced and hosted a television travel show on Discovery Networks. 72.189.86.140 (talk) 04:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

None of those occupations automatically establishes encyclopedic notability (see WP:GNG and WP:BIO), unless significant coverage from reliable independent sources can be shown - that typically excludes self-published information, short mentions, annoucements and other PR-activities by himself or connected organisations. GermanJoe (talk) 17:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Bobby Laurie co-hosts TAKE OFF! with the Savvy Stews though Discovery network, writes for The Huffington Post, has a weekly travel segment on The Daily Buzz, and many other television programs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki4476 (talk • contribs) 16:17, 30 April 2015 (UTC) — Wiki4476 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

TNT The subject probably is notable, but this current article is just a blatant promotion. Get rid of it and make a better, neutral article. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:20, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:BASIC, many passing mentions but no actual coverage from reliable sources. If found to be notable, then stubify because the article is in a very poor state, and I suspect COI or paid editing due to the highly promotional nature of the article. Esquivalience ^t 00:53, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Relisting comment: I was tempted to close it as delete, but lest us give one more week to increase the participation--Ymblanter (talk) 07:32, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 07:32, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Some articles peripherally quote the subject as a "flight attendant" but do not discuss the subject. There is no indication of notability. This seems like WP:SELFPROMOTION.--Rpclod (talk) 12:17, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - has not yet been widely discussed. I found this article, but other that he has not been the subject of an articles, just gives quotes. —Мандичка^YO 😜 15:37, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.