Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boba Fett (books)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:05, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Boba Fett (books)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Text copied from a Star Wars wiki, can't see how it meets the notability criteria for books, it's not very famous. The Evil IP address (talk) 03:18, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. One or two of the books might be notable, but they would better be merged into the articles on their respective authors. The series is not notable. Pburka (talk) 19:23, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this s non-important StarWarsCruft. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 20:16, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Boba Fett per WP:NNC. Looking at that article, there's no length-based reason that a mere stub article like this couldn't be included there. Jclemens (talk) 19:28, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:33, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of any evidence (or even assertion) of notability, and no sources. (There's not much to merge, so no point.) In fact, technically, it's a copyvio of this, because it lacks the CC-BY-SA attribution under the Wookipedia licence (so in its current state, we could speedily delete it under G12). I'll be nice and put the attribution in, and mention copyright rules to the editor who created the article. TheFeds 03:19, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.