Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Rubicon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Teneo. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 18:59, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Rubicon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. fails WP:CORP. Apart from releases, there's not any great depth of coverage Flat Out (talk) 06:14, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge with Teneo. There's some stuff out there, but it's all press releases, brief mentions, or stuff related to the Teneo merger. Nwlaw63 (talk) 14:41, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note - I work at Blue Rubicon, so just providing this comment as hopefully helpful information - there's quite a lot of press coverage for Blue Rubicon in the media, examples including the specialist trade press, such as Corporate Communications Magazine[1], PR Week[2], EsPResso[3] and MarketWatch[4], all of which go beyond being simply press releases from the firm. There's also coverage in the international/national media such as The Guardian[5], Daily Telegraph[6], BBC [7] and Fortune [8]. Markpackuk (talk) 09:31, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Teneo as I found enough links at News and browser to confirm this has gotten attention but maybe not enough for a separate and better article. SwisterTwister talk 05:55, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support redirect Flat Out (talk) 00:32, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.