Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlueNC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BlueNC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on a non-notable, seemingly long-defunct website, originally created by the editor of the site. Only one of the external links is actually still active, and it would not be considered significant coverage in a reliable source. Searches turned up no additional coverage on the website, making it a failure of the WP:GNG and WP:NWEB. The article was WP:PRODed shortly after its creation in 2006, but that was contested by the article creator, so I am bringing it to AFD now. Rorshacma (talk) 21:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and North Carolina. Rorshacma (talk) 21:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: This is about all I find [1], unless we have more, that's not enough for GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 23:35, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:31, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:NWEB. Owen× ☎ 14:52, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.