Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloodlet (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarah-Jane (talk) 08:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bloodlet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly time for another AfD as the first one was 2006 (none of those users are noticeably active anymore) and as my searches found nothing better than this and this along with the currently listed coverage not being solid in-depth (first one is a partial interview and the second is an event listing), I'm not seeing how this is anymore other than a marginally locally known band. SwisterTwister talk 22:02, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:02, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:02, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. Those albums on Victory Records ought to be enough to pass the guideline for inclusion of WP:BAND, really. I didn't find much in the way of online coverage, but there's a short biography and album review at AllMusic and this from Exclaim!. Oh, and Blabbermouth.net described them as "metalcore pioneers". I'd say that they just about scrape the bar, so I'm going for a weak-ish keep for this one. — sparklism ^hey! 07:41, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - while I think that Sparklism is correct and they may technically scrape by in WP:BAND, it is just barely. With that in mind, and knowing that passing a criteria of BAND only means they may be notable, the dearth of coverage makes me lean the other way to delete. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete basically per OneI5969; the sources indicate only some small passing interest, not the kind of sustained coverage that Wikipedia notability requires. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 14:34, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:BAND and WP:SIGCOV.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:08, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.