Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blind (app)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:12, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blind (app) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An app, which is in no way relevant or well-known, but has enough credibility to survive a CSD tag. Nominating for deletion as a non-notable product failing WP:GNG. Dysklyver 10:12, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The said app is repeatedly covered in reliable news sources.

The app is verifies that users actually work in the said tech (or airline etc.) company. Then it allows for anonymous chats and surveys. Which give a very important inside information about the views of tech employees.

The cases where the Blind app has been used in the news are numerous. I will list some below.

• Korean Air VP rage 7 sacking incidence ^[1][2][3]
• Uber Sexual harassment claims ^[4]
• Google memo ^[5][6][7][8]
• Amazon employment conditions and problems^[9]

There are various other mentions. But, I think the point can be made already. Besides, I have started the entry. There is a lot to do on it. But this is another issue altogether. Jazi Zilber (talk) 16:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:40, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Dysklyver 20:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Dysklyver 20:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Dysklyver 20:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Dysklyver 20:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Significant coverage in Forbes, TechCrunch, and Mashable as found by YechezkelZilber are all independent, reliable sources and should be added to the article. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 08:43, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Added. You are welcome to improve in case you feel like it Jazi Zilber (talk) 17:02, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.